extro91

I'm sorry, but I cannot access external content such as YouTube links. If you provide the text you would like translated, I'd be happy to help!

Despite being a type of hardcore punk that I don’t particularly prefer (especially when it comes to hardcore punk where I want complete intransigence and frontal attacks à la Negazione, Bloody Riot, Raw Power, etc.), I have to say that I find them really good, damn. Among the influences, I would definitely include the more melodic Husker Du as well. In my opinion, they sound even more like Nirvana. They rock! Although I have to say one thing: what a shitty name! They could have chosen something better.

Never heard of them. Grunge influences in general don't really excite me, but it depends. I mean, one of the Negazione is involved, so I'll definitely give it a listen.

It’s read in one breath. Stylistically, I think it holds up pretty well. The only flaw is that it emotionally and personally detaches you too much from the story. The only real concession is the curiosity to know more. Ultimately, it’s your brain that is the favored organ that feels called into question while reading this novel. The "pippone" is not about mysteries in general, but mainly about this sub-genre of the "locked room mystery," if I remember correctly. And if you think it’s heavy, you could have skipped it as the author explicitly suggests at the beginning of that chapter, as far as I recall. It doesn’t undermine the novel as a whole at all. As for the revelation of the clues, given the surprising ploy, it didn’t seem "unfair" to me, as you say. "The puzzle is certainly well-constructed, but in my humble opinion, the execution of the deceptions is overly convoluted and in some cases, too unbelievable." With this statement, you demonstrate that you’ve understood the novel too well. The fragile boundary between fantasy and reality at play, particularly concerning the figure of the magician, should have prevented you from writing such a sentence. It’s always somewhat unbelievable or implausible when you already know the "trick" behind it, and before the explanation, you hadn’t arrived at it (even if you might have sensed the killer). The basic clues are all there in the end. The problem is that while reading a novel, managing to come up with such a complex explanation is impossible. You’d have to stop reading, take a piece of paper, jot down all the clues, including the times and the appearance of certain characters in specific places, etc. And I don’t think that’s a flaw. You read a mystery to test your intuitive ability, but also to be surprised by the explanation if possible. Otherwise, you’d judge the book as trivial. Returning to the discussion about the solution to the mystery: it is precisely in this contrast between the desire to keep reading and the need, in order to genuinely test yourself, to stop and consider the novel as the "assignment" of a problem and not as a work of fiction, that the strength of Carr's work lies. I rate it 5 relative to the genre it belongs to, as I believe its importance is undeniable.

I only know the first three works of Banco, which I really liked when I discovered them many years ago. Therefore, I am not familiar with the album in question. However, I enjoyed the review, and in some ways, I find the title of the work you examined significant. "Urgentissimo," as if it's an urgency regarding this thought from you about a great artist whom you certainly held and still hold in high regard. Brao dos ;-)

He has the same expression as I do when I finally pee after holding it for hours.

"who would have gladly done without it."

F1 has not been my "hobby" since 2004, even though I have friends who stay up all night and haven't missed a GP in 10 years. But whether it's for CAZ or Nes, I don't understand all this misanthropy towards F1 fanatics: did you always end up in last place when you were racing Go Karts against your friends? ;-) I can't explain all this bitterness otherwise hehe.

I don't know, but always go McLaren.